Posts Tagged ‘collectors’

Highlights of the Opening of Soul Revival

Monday, May 3rd, 2010

Opening11

Meroe Art Gallery in West Baltimore was charged with Soul Revival –positive energy, engaging art, and poets on FIRE at Saturday night’s opening.

An excited and spiritually filled crowd descended on the gallery as artists, poets and everyone in between viewed the work, the poetry, and even created their own artwork and poetry on the huge canvas that hung on one of the walls, inviting public participation in the exhibition.

Thanks to the artists, poets, collectors, family and friends who filled the gallery and supported the opening. Very special thanks to ThinkBrownINK, Meroe Art Gallery, Sondai Expressions and others who provided support for the opening.

Videos of the performances will be uploaded soon! Check out the photos from the opening here.

Mark Your Calendars for the Artscape Open House for July 17, 2010…details coming soon!

Many Banks Hoard Treasure Troves of Art

Thursday, October 29th, 2009

The New York Times, 10/26/09

“Many of the world’s biggest banks—and biggest recipients of government bailouts—have some of the largest collections of art. Some of the works, including abstract pieces and old masters, are hanging in hallways or boardrooms. But much of it is packed away in storage. The art owned by financial institutions should get out more—at the least to give the taxpayers, who have been so generous with the financial sector, an aesthetic return. Deutsche Bank is believed to own the largest corporate collection in the world, with some 60,000 pieces of contemporary art. UBS owns 40,000 pieces, and JPMorgan Chase 30,000. Combined, that approaches the [New York] Museum of Modern Art’s trove. Banks have various explanations for their hoarding instincts: lots of walls to cover, clients to impress, corporate identities to build. Or perhaps just some past director was a devoted patron.” 

Read more here.

Why Buy Art? Florcy Morisset of Vivant Art Collection shares her thoughts

Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

 

Why invest in Art? My colleague  Florcy Morisset of Vivant Art Collection on Gallery Row in Philadelphia speaks about the importance of investing in Art. Ms. Morisset was the quest speaker at a recent art showcase in the Philadelphia.

Her top 10 Tips to invest in Art?  Three of them are:

 1.  Aquiring Art Because you like it and it Moves you.

2.  Purchase the Lowest Number in the edition.

3.  Select the most unique or stronger piece!

Video Released by Boss-Up Consultant Services for ” A-Train on the Streets”

African-American Museum Director Looking Far and Wide for Artifacts

Sunday, September 13th, 2009

PDN News, September 12, 2009

Although the National Museum of African American History and Culture is not scheduled to open until 2015, founding director Lonnie G. Bunch III has already received hundreds of documents and artifacts that will help convey the African-American story to the public, the Washington Post reports.

When the $500 million museum opens in a new facility on five acres near the Washington Monument, it will include artifacts such as a trumpet once owned by Louis Armstrong, a Jim Crow railroad car, and the original coffin of Emmett Till, the 14-year-old boy killed in Mississippi in 1955 whose battered body in an open casket became a pivotal rallying cry for the modern civil rights movement. To collect these and other items of significance, Bunch and his curatorial team have cast a wide net, holding community meetings in cities around the country where members of the general public can discuss their expectations for the museum and share mementos of that past.

“The exhibitions and opening the building are the priorities,” Bunch told the Post. “Much of the twentieth-century and some of the nineteenth-century materials are in people’s attics and basements and homes.”

Part of the challenge in establishing the museum is determining which stories need to be told. For example, Bunch is not quite sure yet how to discuss slavery, but his wish list of artifacts includes a slave cabin and at least part of a slave ship. He’s also interested in charting the transition from slavery to the quest for education, and his wish list includes a one-room schoolhouse or classroom interior from one of the schools funded by twentieth-century American businessman and philanthropist Julius Rosenwald.

Of course, because the museum is part of the Smithsonian Institution, the staff also has access to a Fort Knox of artifacts, from paintings at the Smithsonian American Art Museum to sports memorabilia at the National Museum of American History. “We will purchase as a last resort,” Bunch said. “I don’t want to make the market unbalanced. But it is nearly impossible to get slavery material and great masters otherwise.”

Source: Trescott, Jacqueline. “Piecing Together a People’s History.” Washington Post 9/04/09

Nine Ways to Lose Money in the Art Market

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

by Richard Polsky
Artnet.com

With collectors being more selective than ever, it stands to reason that anyone left in the game is watching his or her cash more carefully than ever. While no one is certain how to make money in this environment, I guarantee the following examples are nine sure-fire ways to lose money.

1) Buy a mediocre painting instead of a great print. Or for that matter buy a mediocre painting rather than a great drawing. Too often collectors get caught up in art’s snob appeal. The objective is always to buy the best within your budget, regardless of medium. As wonderful a draughtsman as Jasper Johns is, not all of his drawings are up to snuff. It’s much better, from an investment standpoint, to buy one of his great prints, such as Ale Cans. There’s no doubt that it will appreciate at a faster rate than one of Johns’ murky ink-on-vellum drawings.

2) Let the auction houses talk down your reserve. From the auction house’s perspective, it’s all about convincing consignors to accept the lowest reserve possible. If, for instance, you put a painting up for auction and agree to a presale estimate of $600,000-$800,000, and a reserve of $600,000, you can expect a call a few days before the sale that will go something like this: “Look, we think your picture will do well, but given the economy, let’s be on the safe side and lower the reserve to $500,000.”

Don’t do it. If your painting passes at $600,000, the auction house will field offers for it after the sale. Chances are the bidding stalled at $550,000, which means a potential after-sale buyer is likely to offer $500,000 (or less). If your reserve is already down to $500,000, you’ll probably be offered $400,000 (or less). The bottom line is that if you have a good painting, someone will pay up. If not, you shouldn’t have put it up for auction in the first place.

3) Accept a mere 10 percent discount from a gallery. For the purchase of works by contemporary art gods such as Brice Marden, Ellsworth Kelly and a handful of others, a buyer would be lucky to receive a 10 percent discount on any purchase from their galleries. But superstars aside, accepting a standard 10 percent off on even a successful mid-career artist is a mistake.

Galleries generally work on a 50-50 split with artists they represent. This means you should be able to get at least 20 percent off with a little negotiating. Right now, not only are galleries hurting, but so are their artists, who got used to flush times. From a dealer’s perspective, few things are worse than having an artist bug him or her for money. If for no other reason than that, galleries are likely to accept your 20 percent discount request. Try it.

4) Buy with your ears rather than your eyes. Here’s a great way to be taken to the cleaners. I’ll never forget the time the Los Angeles painter Chuck Arnoldi told me how he was at a party when Eli Broad, the country’s richest collector, came over to say hello and ended their discussion by saying, “See you at your studio.”

The merely rich collector Douglas Cramer overheard this snippet of conversation and immediately approached Arnoldi requesting to do the same. In this case, Arnoldi was merciful enough to tell Cramer that “nothing was afoot with his career,” after which Cramer promptly canceled his studio visit. You get the idea.

5) Buy an atypical work. Another sucker bet. There always seems to be one artwork in any given show where the subject matter veers off into the ozone. If you’re buying a Wayne Thiebaud, you obviously want to buy “sugar.” Even though Thiebaud is a first-rate portrait painter, the art market could care less.

No matter how tempting one of his figurative paintings may be, or how attractive its price, treat it like drugs and just say “no.” You may even decide that you genuinely like the painting regardless of market forces. But if you acquire it, when the time comes to sell, you will come to despise your “inspired” purchase when you see how difficult it is to unload at any price.

6) Buy a work from a blue-chip gallery without being properly introduced. I once dealt with a wannabe collector named Paul S. who always bragged to me about his buying trips to New York. He waxed poetic about how “Ileana” (Sonnabend) rolled out the red carpet for him and how fortunate he was to buy a Peter Halley from her.

The only problem was that it was a weak painting that had already been rejected by Sonnabend’s better customers. The point of the story is that if you want to play with the big boys (Gagosian, PaceWildenstein, Marks, etc.), you had better be damn sure that one of their top collectors recommends you. Otherwise, you’ll receive the “Paul S.” treatment.

7) Buy a work by an artist who’s “in play.” If you decide that you want to buy a Richard Prince “Nurse” painting, you might as well put your money into California boutique wine futures and watch them go down — at least you can drink the wine. Richard Prince “Nurses,” originally offered at Gladstone in the mid-2000s, for around $85,000 to members of the “club,” climbed to over $8 million in 2007 (they’ve since dropped back to under $3 million).

Regardless, the speculator gang that ran up his prices at auction are like an elite fraternity house that you can’t join because you aren’t cool enough (in this case substitute “rich enough”) — so don’t even bother trying. Now that Prince has run his course, the next artist “in play” appears to be Peter Doig. Ditto for staying away from his work and market. Better to be an independent thinker and put your money into an artist who’s poised for slow and steady growth — like Fred Tomaselli, Philip Taaffe or Christopher Brown.

8 ) Buy a work right after an artist has died. One of the biggest myths in the art market is that an artist’s work shoots up in value right after his or her death. Wrong (with the exception of Warhol). Most actually go down in value. The reason is that his market usually becomes flooded, thanks to family members struggling to pay estate taxes and dealers and collectors looking to cash in. Better to wait a year or two and let the dust settle, even if you end up having to pay a bit more.

9) Buy works of unusually large scale. The late Los Angeles dealer Paul Kanter once told me, “Never buy a painting that you can’t lift.” He was right. There’s nothing harder to resell than a painting that’s larger than eight feet in any dimension. Even seven feet is cutting it close. Oversize paintings become white elephants in the marketplace.

Only a small pool of potential buyers have the wall space to handle these often ego-driven paintings. If you have a substantial wall that cries out for a massive work that makes a statement, you’re better off buying two smaller works to fill the void.

RICHARD POLSKY is the author of the forthcoming, I Sold Andy Warhol (too soon), due out in September from Other Press.

Millennium Arts Salon 2009-2010 Program Season — It’s All About Art: Celebrating 10 Years

Friday, September 4th, 2009

Now entering its tenth year, Millennium Arts Salon is honored to kick off its 2009-2010 program season on Friday, September 11, 4pm at the Ethiopian Embassy.

This year’s season is titled It’s All About Art: Celebrating 10, referring to MAS’ ten years of programming dating back to 2000, and a celebration of art and culture on several topics including Ethiopia – the birthplace of humankind, art and artists, books, and music.

Featured speakers this season include His Excellency Wondimu Assemnew, Public Diplomacy Officer for Ethiopia, international artist Wosene, and renowned collector of African American art, Dr. Walter O. Evans, among others. Previously announced, this season’s program includes an art and cultural tour to Ethiopia, January 16-29, 2010.

Please join us at the Ethiopian Embassy, 3506 International Drive, NW, Washington, DC 20008 for an insightful salon, Ten Important Facts about Ethiopia, followed by a reception.

This promises to be another fun and exciting season! Please sign up or re-new your membership today at www.millenniumartssalon.org or contact: info@millenniumartssalon.org .

Herb & Dorothy: A Film @ The Corcoran Gallery of Art

Thursday, September 3rd, 2009

Tuesday, September 15, 7 p.m.

Corcoran Gallery of Art
500 Seventeenth Street NW
Washington, DC 20006

Corcoran Contemporaries: $10
Corcoran Members: $12.00
Public: $15.00

In the early 1960′s, Herbert Vogel, a postal clerk, and his wife Dorothy Vogel, a librarian, began purchasing works by unknown artists. Guiding their collecting and buying were two simple rules: the piece had to be affordable, and had to be small enough to fit in their tiny, one-bedroom Manhattan apartment. After thirty years of collecting, the Vogels have managed to build one of the world’s most important contemporary art collections, including over 4,000 works by artists such as Christo and Jeanne-Claude, Richard Tuttle, Sol LeWitt, and Chuck Close- to name a few. In this award-winning documentary, director Megumi Sasaki tells the story of how this unlikely pair shocked the art world and changed the face of contemporary art collecting forever. Megumi Sasaki introduces the film and takes questions from the audience following the screening.

Click here to register for this event

Bill Proposed to Revive ‘Fractional Gift’ Donations of Art

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

From PND News Digest
Posted on August 11, 2009

Reacting to museums’ complaints of sharp declines in donations of art, a bill recently proposed by Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) could revive the practice of so-called fractional gifts by making the process easier and more tax-advantageous, the Wall Street Journal reports.

Prior to passage of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, collectors were allowed to claim a tax deduction when they donated a work of art “incrementally” — that is, donating a certain percentage of rights to the work each year. However, restrictions in the 2006 legislation prevented donors from realizing tax benefits when a donated piece of art appreciated in value and limited the time allotted to complete a fractional donation to ten years. As a result, wealth advisers and estate lawyers soon stopped recommending the practice and such gifts “virtually dried up,” said Association of Art Museum Directors president Michael Conforti.

The bill proposed by Schumer would give donors twenty years to complete the donation of a gift and allow them to take a deduction on a portion of any subsequent appreciation in its value. In addition, the bill would require museums to report fractional donations on their yearly tax forms and exhibit the artwork in proportion to its ownership interest over every five-year period, which would keep it from remaining permanently in the donor’s private collection during the gifting period. Gifts also would be subject to a binding written contract to protect against challenges by heirs after a donor’s death, with donations valued at more than $1 million requiring a review by the IRS’s art advisory panel.

Critics of the proposed bill argue that if donated art declines in value, a donor’s tax break could shrink. Indeed, the bill comes at a time when prices for art have dropped 30 percent and are on track to return to 2004 levels, according to Mei Moses Art Indexes, which tracks repeat-auction sales.

Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA), who as chairman of the Senate Finance Committee spearheaded the initial changes in the original Pension Protection Act, said the proposed bill is a compromise. “Some museum officials thought Congress went too far to shut down abuse,” he said. “I still think partial donations of art are of questionable value to taxpayers, but museum officials and their champions feel strongly otherwise, so I’m willing to continue to listen.”

Banjo, Shelly. “Restoration Work on Gifts of Art.” Wall Street Journal 8/08/09.

FacebookTwitter